linux-kernel - Re: Failover Kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1235749850.4718.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:50:50 +0100
From:	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:	Tarkan Erimer <tarkan.erimer@...knet.net.tr>
Cc:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Failover Kernel


On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 17:32 +0200, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
> Diego Calleja wrote:
> > Isn't this what kdump does right now? http://lwn.net/Articles/108595/
> >   
> 
> Yep, very similar to "kdump". But, kdump is too simple. Backup kernel is 
> just so minimal and only to handle crash dump thing. With "Failover 
> kernel", I'm talking about fully functional backup kernel like primary 
> one. Not just too minimally functioning crash dump kernel.

How is the backup kernel minimal? It is usually the very same kernel as
the "primary" one. You can use the same initrd as well and do a full
multiuser boot.

-- 
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/