linux-kernel - Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:42:10 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, me@...ipebalbi.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	felipe.balbi@...ia.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
	sameo@...nedhand.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...)

On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 28 February 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, David Brownell wrote:
> > >   drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c
> > > 
> > > Where you'll observe twl_init_irq() at line 688 setting
> > > up the thread and the Primary IRQ Handler (PIH) dispatch.
> > > That's pretty much bog-standard chained IRQ setup code,
> > > except that it chains through a thread.
> > 
> > So this would be the perfect candidate to test the generic threaded
> > code I posted a few days ago ?
> 
> Could be.  URL?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/26/146

	tglx
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/