[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090302202918.GA14471@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:29:18 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@...onnor.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stefan Reinauer <stepan@...esystems.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coreboot@...eboot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioremap mptable -v2
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> V3: according to Ingo, seperate get_mpc_size()
No, that was not my suggestion. My suggestion was to separate
this whole 'else if' branch:
> } else if (mpf->physptr) {
> + struct mpc_table *mpc;
> + unsigned long size;
>
> + size = get_mpc_size(mpf->physptr);
> + mpc = early_ioremap(mpf->physptr, size);
> /*
> * Read the physical hardware table. Anything here will
> * override the defaults.
> */
> - if (!smp_read_mpc(phys_to_virt(mpf->physptr), early)) {
> + if (!smp_read_mpc(mpc, early)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> smp_found_config = 0;
> #endif
... into a helper function - if that improves the code. Your
patch does early_ioremap, iounmap then ioremap and iounmap -
quite pointlessly.
You should resist cleanup suggestions that make the code worse,
even if it comes from a maintainer :-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists