[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49AC459F.10606@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:46:23 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Kevin O'Connor" <kevin@...onnor.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stefan Reinauer <stepan@...esystems.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coreboot@...eboot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: ioremap mptable -v2
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> V3: according to Ingo, seperate get_mpc_size()
>
> No, that was not my suggestion. My suggestion was to separate
> this whole 'else if' branch:
>
>> } else if (mpf->physptr) {
>> + struct mpc_table *mpc;
>> + unsigned long size;
>>
>> + size = get_mpc_size(mpf->physptr);
>> + mpc = early_ioremap(mpf->physptr, size);
>> /*
>> * Read the physical hardware table. Anything here will
>> * override the defaults.
>> */
>> - if (!smp_read_mpc(phys_to_virt(mpf->physptr), early)) {
>> + if (!smp_read_mpc(mpc, early)) {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
>> smp_found_config = 0;
>> #endif
>
> ... into a helper function - if that improves the code.
oh, i missed it
> Your patch does early_ioremap, iounmap then ioremap and iounmap -
> quite pointlessly.
try to get exact mpc size.
>
> You should resist cleanup suggestions that make the code worse,
> even if it comes from a maintainer :-)
we could do that later. to make __get_smp_config smaller and readable.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists