linux-kernel - [PATCH] lockdep: fix incorrect state name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1236172646.5330.7450.camel@laptop>
Date:	Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:17:26 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lockdep: fix incorrect state name

Subject: lockdep: fix incorrect state name
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Wed Mar 04 13:51:13 CET 2009

In the recent mark_lock_irq() rework a bug snuck in that would report the
state of write locks causing irq inversion under a read lock as a read
lock.

Fix this by masking the read bit of the state when validating write
dependencies.

Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 kernel/lockdep.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2016,7 +2016,8 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task
 			     enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
 
 static int
-mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit)
+mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
 	int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
 	int read = new_bit & 1;
@@ -2044,7 +2045,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, 
 	 * states.
 	 */
 	if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
-			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit)))
+			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~1)))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/