linux-kernel - [tip:core/locking] lockdep: fix incorrect state name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-1c21f14ec48a2256fb03682b24dddd23eacdc96f@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:39:25 GMT
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/locking] lockdep: fix incorrect state name

Commit-ID:  1c21f14ec48a2256fb03682b24dddd23eacdc96f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/1c21f14ec48a2256fb03682b24dddd23eacdc96f
Author:     "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:51:13 +0100
Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:38:33 +0100

lockdep: fix incorrect state name

In the recent mark_lock_irq() rework a bug snuck in that would report the
state of write locks causing irq inversion under a read lock as a read
lock.

Fix this by masking the read bit of the state when validating write
dependencies.

Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1236172646.5330.7450.camel@...top>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 kernel/lockdep.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 022d2ed..ef6584f 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2015,7 +2015,8 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
 			     enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
 
 static int
-mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit)
+mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+		enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
 {
 	int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
 	int read = new_bit & 1;
@@ -2043,7 +2044,7 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int new_bit)
 	 * states.
 	 */
 	if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) &&
-			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit)))
+			!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~1)))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/