[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306140612.GA8566@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:06:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make text_poke() atomic using fixmap
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > Here is the patch which uses fixmaps instead of vmap in
> > text_poke(). This made the code much simpler than I thought
> > :).
>
> Looks good to me at a quick glance albeit Linus had second
> thoughts about using fixmaps for this in the past. But with
> delayed-flush for vmaps i think fixmaps are again the simpler
> and more robust - albeit more limited - choice ...
>
> In any case, the x86 tree already unified fixmap.h so could
> you please resend the whole series as a 0/3, 1/3, 2/3, 3/3
> thing against tip:master, starting a new thread on lkml? (this
> thread is already way too deep)
Ping? I think there's agreement and it would be nice to fix this
in .30. Looks too complex for .29 - maybe backportable to .29.1
if it stays problem-free in testing.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists