[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306184514.GE7420@localhost>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:45:14 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] dma-debug: add hash functions for
dma_debug_entries
[Frederic Weisbecker - Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:50:52PM +0100]
...
| > +/*
| > + * Add an entry to a hash bucket
| > + */
| > +static void hash_bucket_add(struct hash_bucket *bucket,
| > + struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
| > +{
| > + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &bucket->list);
| > +}
| > +
| > +/*
| > + * Remove entry from a hash bucket list
| > + */
| > +static void hash_bucket_del(struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
| > +{
| > + list_del(&entry->list);
| > +}
|
|
| Perhaps the two wrappers above are unnecessary, since they are actually
| used once and only wrap a single list operation. No?
|
| Frederic.
Hi Frederic,
I think it would be better to make them 'inline' only but remain
the wrappers as is, since it show logic flow and hides internal data
details. But it's my personal opinion.
|
...
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists