[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090306191059.GE7329@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:11:00 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] dma-debug: add hash functions for
dma_debug_entries
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 09:45:14PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Frederic Weisbecker - Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:50:52PM +0100]
> ...
> | > +/*
> | > + * Add an entry to a hash bucket
> | > + */
> | > +static void hash_bucket_add(struct hash_bucket *bucket,
> | > + struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
> | > +{
> | > + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &bucket->list);
> | > +}
> | > +
> | > +/*
> | > + * Remove entry from a hash bucket list
> | > + */
> | > +static void hash_bucket_del(struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
> | > +{
> | > + list_del(&entry->list);
> | > +}
> |
> |
> | Perhaps the two wrappers above are unnecessary, since they are actually
> | used once and only wrap a single list operation. No?
> |
> | Frederic.
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> I think it would be better to make them 'inline' only but remain
> the wrappers as is, since it show logic flow and hides internal data
> details. But it's my personal opinion.
Yeah, I guess it's only a matter of taste :-)
Anyway, as you said, it should be inlined.
> |
> ...
>
> - Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists