[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090306150056.1bfa6d1f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:00:56 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: cooloney@...nel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonic.zhang@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] Blackfin Serial Driver: Change hardware
flowcontrol from poll to interrupt driven.
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:49:13 -0500
Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 17:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, __6 Mar 2009 14:42:46 +0800 Bryan Wu wrote:
> >> From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>
> >>
> >> Only CTS bit is affected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
> >
> > Another completely useless changelog.
>
> the summary, while brief, describes the change: the flowcontrol is
> currently implemented by polling, but this changes it to an interrupt
> based system
yes, but it doesn't explain why the change was made.
> > Your [PATCH 00/18] email described all these patches as
> > needed-in-2.6.29 bugfixes. __As far as I can tell (based on almost zero
> > information), this patch is not a bugfix.
>
> because the current implementation is polling (busy waiting), the
> kernel will basically hang when the remote asserts hardware
> flowcontrol pins. if this is only asserted for short periods (less
> than 1 char time), then it's not really noticed ... but it still
> destroys latencies.
That.
Please send through replacement changelogs for all the patches which I
complained about. Then I'll pick through it all and see what we can do
about a 2.6.29 merge.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists