linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Add full hotkey support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090307154424.GA3909@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:44:24 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hal@...ts.freedesktop.org, Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Add full hotkey support

On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

> - patch toshiba_acpi to return KEY_SUSPEND/KEY_HIBERNATE instead of 
> KEY_SLEEP/KEY_SUSPEND. This depends on commit 
> 6932b918e05b06165ed3457a9f3aa279099a7cbd in linux-next.
> 
> - patch HAL to recognize KEY_HIBERNATE and return "suspend" for 
> KEY_SUSPEND; right now it is:
> 
>         [KEY_SLEEP] = "sleep",
>         [KEY_SUSPEND] = "hibernate",

Ugh. Why are we changing this? The semantics were pretty clear before. 
The KEY_SUSPEND to hibernate mapping was decided years ago, and it's 
clearly an incompatible change as far as userspace goes.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/