[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15e53e180903071219q4ed318edt2fa8f492426c0ab6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:19:51 +0000
From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hal@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] toshiba_acpi: Add full hotkey support
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:38:53PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>
>> - patch toshiba_acpi to return KEY_SUSPEND/KEY_HIBERNATE instead of
>> KEY_SLEEP/KEY_SUSPEND. This depends on commit
>> 6932b918e05b06165ed3457a9f3aa279099a7cbd in linux-next.
>>
>> - patch HAL to recognize KEY_HIBERNATE and return "suspend" for
>> KEY_SUSPEND; right now it is:
>>
>> [KEY_SLEEP] = "sleep",
>> [KEY_SUSPEND] = "hibernate",
>
> Ugh. Why are we changing this? The semantics were pretty clear before.
> The KEY_SUSPEND to hibernate mapping was decided years ago, and it's
> clearly an incompatible change as far as userspace goes.
See my mails to linux-acpi. Hibernate = sleep to disk, suspend = sleep
to ram, and sleep = sleep type not indicated or unknown. This is how
it is in Xorg and the session now.
Mapping KEY_SUSPEND to hibernate is just insane. Can you please change
the toshiba driver to use KEY_HIBERNATE and KEY_SUSPEND as thinkpad
now does? Thanks.
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists