linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49B1C69F.70904@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:58:07 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg_space

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Impact: get correct pci_cfg_size for host_bridge
> 
> more host bridges support 4k cfg, so check them directly
> instead of quirks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>

I'm utterly confused by this.  This is basically saying we should try to 
probe for an extended device space for every host bridge.  Logically 
speaking, this is valid: if there is a valid path by which we can probe 
for byte 256 then it should succeed.

HOWEVER, the same argument applies for *every single device*.  So if 
this does indeed work, why should we limit it to host bridges?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/