linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:03:51 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg_space

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Impact: get correct pci_cfg_size for host_bridge
>>
>> more host bridges support 4k cfg, so check them directly
>> instead of quirks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> 
> I'm utterly confused by this.  This is basically saying we should try to
> probe for an extended device space for every host bridge.  Logically
> speaking, this is valid: if there is a valid path by which we can probe
> for byte 256 then it should succeed.
> 
> HOWEVER, the same argument applies for *every single device*.  So if
> this does indeed work, why should we limit it to host bridges?

currently only found amd and intel host bridge (on cpu or io hub) need this trick.
other device we could still use quirks.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/