[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B4343B.9050807@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:19 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/pci: try to detect host_bridge pci_cfg_space
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:04:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> I'd also suggest to flip around the subject line from x86/pci to
>>> pci/x86 - it's more of a PCI patch than a pure x86 patch. The
>>> same problem could affect other platforms too i suspect.
>> Not all platforms expose the root bridge in PCI configuration space.
>> Intel ia64 platforms do have a materialised root bridge; HP's don't.
>> (I don't know whether Intel ship any PCIe ia64 machines or not). I
>> don't remember details for other platforms, but I think Intel is the odd
>> one out in this regard.
>>
>
> It's still generic PCI code, however. If there is no host bridge
> exposed in PCI space, the patch is a noop.
ok, will split that patch to two
1. one touch pci.c
2. and one touch x86/pci.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists