linux-kernel - Re: hp accelerometer: add freefall detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090308211423.GB17680@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:14:24 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc:	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	trenn@...e.de
Subject: Re: hp accelerometer: add freefall detection

On Sat 2009-02-14 17:01:01, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lis3lv02d.c
> [...]
> > +static int lis3lv02d_misc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> [...]
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               clear_bit(0, &adev.misc_opened);
> > +               printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME ": IRQ%d allocation failed\n", ad
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> > +       }
> > +       lis3lv02d_increase_use(&adev);
> > +       printk("lis3: registered interrupt %d\n", adev.irq);
> 
> Is this a debug printk that should be removed altogether or should it
> be given a proper format and KERN_DEBUG?

It should be deleted, yes. I'll prepare the patch once previous
changes are merged.
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/