[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903081438180.30551@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Paul Menage wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * current_cpuset_object_allowed - can a slab object be allocated on a node?
> > + * @node: the node for object allocation
> > + * @flags: allocation flags
> > + *
> > + * Return non-zero if object is allowed, zero otherwise.
> > + */
> > +int current_cpuset_object_allowed(int node, gfp_t flags)
> > +{
> > + return !is_slab_hardwall(task_cs(current)) ||
> > + cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(node, flags);
> > +}
> > +
>
> This should be in rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() in order to safely
> dereference the result of task_cs(current)
>
I've folded the following into the patch, thanks Paul.
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1205,8 +1205,12 @@ int current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void)
*/
int current_cpuset_object_allowed(int node, gfp_t flags)
{
- return !is_slab_hardwall(task_cs(current)) ||
- cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(node, flags);
+ int is_hardwall;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ is_hardwall = is_slab_hardwall(task_cs(current));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return !is_hardwall || cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(node, flags);
}
static int update_relax_domain_level(struct cpuset *cs, s64 val)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists