[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090310091800.GC3263@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:18:00 +0100
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ville Syrjala <syrjala@....fi>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c: fix read_bit()
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:14:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/w1-gpio.c
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static u8 w1_gpio_read_bit(void *data)
> > {
> > struct w1_gpio_platform_data *pdata = data;
> >
> > - return gpio_get_value(pdata->pin);
> > + return gpio_get_value(pdata->pin) ? 1 : 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int __init w1_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> We recently merged a patch (I forget where) which fixed one
> gpio_get_value() implementation so that it always returns 0 or 1.
>
> From which I deduce that the correct fix for <whatever problem you're
> seeing> is to fix <whichever driver that is>?
I agree those functions should return 0 and 1 only, but my patch fixes
the w1-gpio driver for all platforms at once, so people can use it.
On the other hand, I will submit a patch which modifies PXA's
gpio_get_value() and see what the maintainers say, but I can't go thru
all the implemenations of all architectures to do this.
So for the time being, the above patch helps many users of that driver.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists