[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090310150415.GL3850@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:04:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Free setup_irq() interrupt V2
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > From: Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>
> > This patch adds a __free_irq() function for releasing
> > interrupts requested with setup_irq().
>
> I think there is a simpler solution than adding yet another
> function for the confusion of driver writers. See below.
Uhm, i asked for that solution ;-) To reduce the confusion in
generic code with yet another IRQF flag.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists