linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Free setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:26:39 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Free setup_irq() interrupt V2

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > Magnus,
> > 
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > From: Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>
> > > This patch adds a __free_irq() function for releasing 
> > > interrupts requested with setup_irq().
> > 
> > I think there is a simpler solution than adding yet another 
> > function for the confusion of driver writers. See below.
> 
> Uhm, i asked for that solution ;-) 

Uhm, I missed that :) 

> To reduce the confusion in generic code with yet another IRQF flag.

Hmm. I still prefer a solution which confuses the few people hacking
on kernel/irq/* instead of having another function which confuses the
already confused driver writers.

I can live with the two functions as well, but then please let us use
a function name which is more intuitive than __free_irq().

setup_irq()   -> remove_irq()
request_irq() -> free_irq()

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/