[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0903101153520.3979-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 08/11] Modify Ptrace routines to access breakpoint
registers
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > -static unsigned long debugreg_addr_limit(struct task_struct *task)
> > -{
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> > - if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_IA32))
> > - return IA32_PAGE_OFFSET - 3;
> > -#endif
> > - return TASK_SIZE_MAX - 7;
> > -}
> > -
>
> I dont see where this security check has been carried over into
> the generic code. The new code has:
Probably the IA32_EMULATION stuff was added after the hw-breakpoint
patch was written.
> +int arch_check_va_in_userspace(unsigned long va, struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + return (va < TASK_SIZE);
> +}
>
> but i think that misses the detail that it's not just the start
> address of an x86 breakpoint that has to be considered, but also
> the end addess of it.
>
> For example a hardware breakpoint can be at 0xbfffffff with a
> length of 4 bytes - thus overlapping into kernel-space by 3
> bytes. It is important to not let that happen.
Quite correct.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists