[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B6CB84.8060404@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:20:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Absolute symbols in vmlinux_64.lds.S
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> I have no complaint with that. I believe the symbols are absolute
> simply because they were originally coded that way and the relocatable
> kernel work on x86_64 didn't need them to change.
>
I have a vague memory of a bug in the x86-64 ld.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists