lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:25:18 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Absolute symbols in vmlinux_64.lds.S

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> I have no complaint with that.  I believe the symbols are absolute
>> simply because they were originally coded that way and the relocatable
>> kernel work on x86_64 didn't need them to change.
>> 
>
> I have a vague memory of a bug in the x86-64 ld.

Oh.  I'm certain of it.  ld has all kinds of bugs off and on,
occasionally we are bound to run into a few of them.

ld bugs isn't the reason for using absolute linker symbols.  We use a
bunch of relative linker symbols as well.  All of the generic linker
scripts sections use them as well as a few of the x86_64 specific
sections.

For crazy things like 0 relative per cpu sections it might matter.
For the rest of the symbols absolute or relative simply
doesn't matter.

Is anyone interested in writing a patch testing it and changing things?

If not things should be good enough for now.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ