[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090311182656.GA23739@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:26:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: use raw spinlocks for trace_vprintk
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > commit 80370cb758e7ca2692cd9fb5e413d970b1f4b2b2
> > Author: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > Date: Tue Mar 10 17:16:35 2009 -0400
> >
> > tracing: use raw spinlocks for trace_vprintk
> >
> > Impact: prevent locking up by lockdep tracer
> >
> > The lockdep tracer uses trace_vprintk and thus trace_vprintk can not
> > call back into lockdep without locking up.
>
> Hmm, I did this when I posted the lockdep tracepoints, so someone then
> did a bad copy/paste job when renaming ftrace_printk or something?
>
> See efed792d6738964f399a508ef9e831cd60fa4657
What's the conclusion in this thread? I'm holding the pull
until there's agreement.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists