linux-kernel - Re: [BUG,2.6.28,s390] Fails to boot in Hercules S/390 emulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903120849270.29264@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:50:34 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG,2.6.28,s390] Fails to boot in Hercules S/390 emulator

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, john stultz wrote:
> Maybe a different way of expressing what we're calculating is the
> following:
> 
> xtime.tv_nsec = (clock->xtime_nsec + (1<<clock->shift)) >> clock->shift
> clock->xtime_nsec = (1<<clock->shift) 
> 			- (clock->xtime_nsec &((1<<clock->shift)-1)
> 
> In other words: The rounded up portion - the masked remainder in
> xtime_nsec.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Yes, now that my brain works again. I knew I was missing something.

You are definitely right: math _is_ hard :)

    tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/