[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090312122427.GA24295@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:24:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() and
iomap_atomic_prot_pfn()
* Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/12 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>:
> >
> > * Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2009/3/12 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> >> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> >> kmap_atomic_pfn() and iomap_atomic_prot_pfn() are almost same except
> >> >> pgprot. This patch removes the code duplication for these two functions.
> >> >
> >> > How exaclty does this compile with CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh, I didn't try without CONFIG_HIGHMEM.
> >
> > i had it applied in testing locally and didnt see problems so
> > far. Let me know if you can see any problems.
>
> It actually didn't compile with CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n as Thomas
> pointed out.
>
> arch/x86/mm/iomap_32.c:49: undefined reference to
> `kmap_atomic_prot_pfn'
hm, i didnt see any build failures myself. Could you please send
the .config that triggers it?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists