linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 2/2] tracepoints for softirq entry/exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090312190243.GC11045@nowhere>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:02:50 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, fche@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	compudj@...stal.dyndns.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2] tracepoints for softirq entry/exit - tracepoints

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:36:03PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> 
> introduce softirq entry/exit tracepoints. These are useful for
> augmenting existing tracers, and to figure out softirq frequencies and
> timings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  include/trace/irq_event_types.h |   12 ++++++++++++
>  kernel/softirq.c                |    7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/irq_event_types.h b/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> index 214bb92..38b4bdd 100644
> --- a/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> +++ b/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> @@ -40,4 +40,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(irq_handler_exit,
>  		  __entry->irq, __entry->ret ? "handled" : "unhandled")
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_FORMAT(irq_softirq_entry,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct softirq_action *h, struct softirq_action *vec),
> +	TP_ARGS(h, vec),
> +	TP_FMT("softirq=%d action=%s", h - vec, softirq_to_name[h-vec])
> +	);
> +
> +TRACE_FORMAT(irq_softirq_exit,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct softirq_action *h, struct softirq_action *vec),
> +	TP_ARGS(h, vec),
> +	TP_FMT("softirq=%d action=%s", h - vec, softirq_to_name[h-vec])
> +	);
> +
>  #undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index ba1511f..c378d53 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/tick.h>
> +#include <trace/irq.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  /*
> @@ -186,6 +187,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_enable_ip);
>   */
>  #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
>  
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_softirq_entry);
> +DEFINE_TRACE(irq_softirq_exit);


Just one nit here. The "irq_" prefix seems to me too much.
On the trace we have:

/* irq_softirq_entry: softirq=nb action=nb_to_logical_name */

It's even too much words that says the same things.
Moreover, we have the logical name, the number seems not very useful
because we have its logical translation just after.

I would suggest to have just:

/* softirq_entry: nb_to_logical_name */

ie:

/* softirq_entry: SCHED_SOFTIRQ */

Don't you think it's more clear and obvious?

Other than that, I think these tracepoints are a good idea.


>  asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
>  {
>  	struct softirq_action *h;
> @@ -212,8 +216,9 @@ restart:
>  		if (pending & 1) {
>  			int prev_count = preempt_count();
>  
> +			trace_irq_softirq_entry(h, softirq_vec);
>  			h->action(h);
> -
> +			trace_irq_softirq_exit(h, softirq_vec);
>  			if (unlikely(prev_count != preempt_count())) {
>  				printk(KERN_ERR "huh, entered softirq %td %s %p"
>  				       "with preempt_count %08x,"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/