lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:05:05 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
	jirislaby@...il.com, will.newton@...il.com, hancockrwd@...il.com,
	jeremy@...p.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] introduce macro spin_event_timeout()

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> sched_clock() does that, but:
>  - it falls back to jiffies on poor platforms

I think it's ok to fall back to jiffies where necessary, but these two
functions are too heavy-weight for my tastes.

> But something that seems to always work, is simply count loops and rely
> on whatever delay is in the specified loop.
>
> #define spin_until_timeout(condition, timeout, rc) \
>        for (unsigned long __timeout = 0; \
>             !(rc = (condition)) && __timeout < (timeout); \
>             __timeout++)

But that's the thing - I don't want a required delay inside the loop.

I guess I'm going to have to think about this for a while.  I'd like
to see something like cycles_per_usec() as a companion function to
get_cycles().

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists