[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090312105622.43A6.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:00:18 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Enrik.Berkhan@...com, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded
> Hi, Kosaki-san.
>
> I think ramfs pages's unevictablility should not depend on CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
> It would be better to remove dependency of CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU ?
>
> How about this ?
> It's just RFC. It's not tested.
>
> That's because we can't reclaim that pages regardless of whether there is unevictable list or not
maybe, your patch work.
but we can remove CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU build option itself completely
after nommu folks confirmed CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU works well on their machine
it is more cleaner IMHO.
What do you think?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists