[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360903111911l4e14685emb0261fe649bc03fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:11:53 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, dhowells@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
Enrik.Berkhan@...com, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may
get wrongly discarded
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Kosaki-san.
>>
>> I think ramfs pages's unevictablility should not depend on CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
>> It would be better to remove dependency of CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU ?
>>
>> How about this ?
>> It's just RFC. It's not tested.
>>
>> That's because we can't reclaim that pages regardless of whether there is unevictable list or not
>
> maybe, your patch work.
>
> but we can remove CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU build option itself completely
> after nommu folks confirmed CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU works well on their machine
>
> it is more cleaner IMHO.
> What do you think?
>
>
I agree your opinion, totally
Let us wait nommu folks's comments.
--
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists