lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49B86E29.6050108@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:06:33 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
CC:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org,
	cpw@....com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] percpu: kill percpu_alloc() and friends

Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>> +static inline void *__alloc_percpu(size_t size, size_t align)
>>  {
>> +       /*
>> +        * Can't easily make larger alignment work with kmalloc.  WARN
>> +        * on it.  Larger alignment should only be used for module
>> +        * percpu sections on SMP for which this path isn't used.
>> +        */
>> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(align > __alignof__(unsigned long long));
>>        return kzalloc(size, gfp);
>>  }
> 
> This WARN_ON just pinged for me when I built & ran linux-next tag next-20090311
> 
> Stack trace from the WARN_ON pointed to __create_workqueue_key() which
> does:
> 
>          wq->cpu_wq = alloc_percpu(struct cpu_workqueue_struct);
> 
> and the cpu_workqueue_struct is defined as ____cacheline_aligned
> 
> I hit this on ia64, but all this code looks generic.

Yeap, it's fixed now, but as Rusty pointed out, once move to dynamic
percpu allocator is complete, we wouldn't need cacheline alignment for
percpu data structures.  It will only hurt performance by wasting
cachelines.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ