[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090311202637.d8c2343b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:26:37 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>, Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tracing: keep ring buffer to minimum size till used
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:37:21 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> Impact: less memory impact on systems not using tracer
>
> When the kernel boots up that has tracing configured, it allocates
> the default size of the ring buffer. This currently happens to be
> 1.4Megs per possible CPU. This is quite a bit of wasted memory if
> the system is never using the tracer.
>
> The current solution is to keep the ring buffers to a minimum size
> until the user uses them. Once a tracer is piped into the current_tracer
> the ring buffer will be expanded to the default size. If the user
> changes the size of the ring buffer, it will take the size given
> by the user immediately.
>
> If the user adds a "ftrace=" to the kernel command line, then the ring
> buffers will be set to the default size on initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 4c97947..0c1dc18 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_max_latency;
> unsigned long __read_mostly tracing_thresh;
>
> /*
> + * On boot up, the ring buffer is set to the minimum size, so that
> + * we do not waste memory on systems that are not using tracing.
> + */
> +static int ring_buffer_expanded;
> +
> +/*
> * We need to change this state when a selftest is running.
> * A selftest will lurk into the ring-buffer to count the
> * entries inserted during the selftest although some concurrent
> @@ -128,6 +134,8 @@ static int __init set_ftrace(char *str)
> {
> strncpy(bootup_tracer_buf, str, BOOTUP_TRACER_SIZE);
> default_bootup_tracer = bootup_tracer_buf;
> + /* We are using ftrace early, expand it */
> + ring_buffer_expanded = 1;
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("ftrace=", set_ftrace);
> @@ -2315,6 +2323,40 @@ int tracer_init(struct tracer *t, struct trace_array *tr)
> return t->init(tr);
> }
>
> +static int tracing_resize_ring_buffer(unsigned long size)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * If kernel or user changes the size of the ring buffer
> + * it get completed.
> + */
That comment needs help.
> + ring_buffer_expanded = 1;
> +
> + ret = ring_buffer_resize(global_trace.buffer, size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ring_buffer_resize(max_tr.buffer, size);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + int r;
> +
> + r = ring_buffer_resize(global_trace.buffer,
> + global_trace.entries);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + /* AARGH! We are left with different
> + * size max buffer!!!! */
So does that one, but at least it's understandable ;)
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + tracing_disabled = 1;
> + }
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + global_trace.entries = size;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> struct trace_option_dentry;
>
> static struct trace_option_dentry *
> @@ -2330,6 +2372,13 @@ static int tracing_set_tracer(const char *buf)
> struct tracer *t;
> int ret = 0;
>
> + if (!ring_buffer_expanded) {
> + ret = tracing_resize_ring_buffer(trace_buf_size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + ret = 0;
> + }
This would look a bit less racy were it to happen inside the lock.
> mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
> for (t = trace_types; t; t = t->next) {
> if (strcmp(t->name, buf) == 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists