[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090311203222.7515107d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:32:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>, Pekka Paalanen <pq@....fi>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ring-buffer: only allocate buffers for online cpus
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:37:24 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> Impact: save on memory
>
> Currently, a ring buffer was allocated for each "possible_cpus". On
> some systems, this is the same as NR_CPUS. Thus, if a system defined
> NR_CPUS = 64 but it only had 1 CPU, we could have possibly 63 useless
> ring buffers taking up space. With a default buffer of 3 megs, this
> could be quite drastic.
>
> This patch changes the ring buffer code to only allocate ring buffers
> for online CPUs. If a CPU goes off line, we do not free the buffer.
> This is because the user may still have trace data in that buffer
> that they would like to look at.
>
> Perhaps in the future we could add code to delete a ring buffer if
> the CPU is offline and the ring buffer becomes empty.
>
> ...
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists