[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10f740e80903150353i233d0da5rabde6e97607e3435@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:53:03 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: improve seed in randconfig
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:28, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> 'make randconfig' uses glibc's rand function, and the seed of
> that PRNG is set via:
>
> srand(time(NULL));
>
> But 'time()' only increases once every second - freezing the
> randconfig result within a single second.
>
> My Nehalem testbox does randconfig much faster than 1 second
> and i have a few scripts that do 'randconfig until condition X'
> loops.
>
> Those scripts currently waste a lot of CPU time due to randconfig
> changing its seed only once per second currently.
>
> Change the seed to be micrseconds based. (I checked the statistical
> spread of the seed - the now.tv_sec*now.tv_usec multiplication
> there further improves it.)
> + gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
> +
> + seed = (unsigned int)(now.tv_sec*now.tv_usec);
Just wondering: may there be some platforms that don't offer microsecond
resolution, and tv_usec is always zero?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists