[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903180822.31196.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:22:30 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com,
steiner@....com
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 05:26:30 Cliff Wickman wrote:
>
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
>
> A patch on Mar13 2009 introduced a bug. I hope the below 1-line fix can
> make the 'urgent' list, and get fixed before that patch moves on.
>
> The Mar13 patch is saved at
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123683186504948&w=2
>
> The allocation of per-cpu uv_flush_tlb_mask's in arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
> changed a variable that should been reset to 0.
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for tracking this. May I suggest this slightly enhanced version?
Subject: cpumask: fix tlb_uv initialization
Impact: fix boot on UV systems
Commit 76ba0ecda0de9accea9a91cb6dbde46782110e1c "cpumask: use cpumask_var_t
in uv_flush_tlb_others" used cur_cpu as an iterator; it was supposed to be
zero for the code below it.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
index 8afb691..deb5ebb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
int node;
int nblades;
int last_blade;
- int cur_cpu = 0;
+ int cur_cpu;
if (!is_uv_system())
return 0;
@@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static int __init uv_bau_init(void)
uv_mmask = (1UL << uv_hub_info->n_val) - 1;
nblades = 0;
last_blade = -1;
+ cur_cpu = 0;
for_each_online_node(node) {
blade = uv_node_to_blade_id(node);
if (blade == last_blade)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists