[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237394936.3132.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:18:56 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: oops in tracepoint_update_probe_range() (was: Re: [oops -tip]
: x86 AMD 64)
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Good: f4c3c4cdb1de232
> > Bad : 1e08816af0bc345
> >
> > Config:
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/oops_20090318/config-hpdv5-tip-bad-20090318
> >
> > oops:
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/oops_20090318/oops_page1.jpg
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/oops_20090318/oops_page2.jpg
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/oops_20090318/oops_page3.jpg
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/oops_20090318/oops_page4.jpg
> >
> > <freeze>
>
> Steve, Frederic - the crashes above are in:
>
> tracepoint_update_probe_range()
>
> in a modular kernel apparently.
>
This fixed the oops for me, Is this looks OK to you:
Subject: [PATCH] x86: tracepoint.c fix oops
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff8107d4de>] tracepoint_update_probe_range+0x1f/0x9b
PGD 13d5fb067 PUD 13d688067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
---
kernel/tracepoint.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
index 7960274..80d1353 100644
--- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
+++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
@@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint *begin,
mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
+ if (!iter)
+ goto out;
mark_entry = get_tracepoint(iter->name);
if (mark_entry) {
set_tracepoint(&mark_entry, iter,
@@ -288,6 +290,7 @@ void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint *begin,
disable_tracepoint(iter);
}
}
+out:
mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
}
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists