linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090318164926.GC31315@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:49:26 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)


* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:26:21 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:17 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>>>>> [adding cc:s]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [same report for March 12]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>>>>>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Changes since 20090310:
> >>>>>>> Building on i386 generates a ton of printk format warnings:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 10 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 13 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 14 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 17 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 18 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 21 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>> kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 22 has type 'unsigned int'
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is corrected in Ingo's tip tree. I changed %lu to %zu to
> >>>>> handle the "sizeof()" case. The fix was suggested by Andrew Morton.
> >>>> This build warning is still around (20090318).
> >>>> Is the fix not in some branch that is imported into linux-next or what?
> >>> be patient.
> >>>
> >>> 	Ingo
> >> I think that 7 days is being patient for a simple build fix.
> > 
> > s/build fix/harmless build warning fix
> 
> 180+ lines of noise in a build log.
> 
> > If you are interested in having a resolution you can git-merge the 
> > latest development tree yourself and you can get rid of that 
> > warning.
> > 
> > Of course that way you'd expose yourself to even fresher code, 
> > potentially with much more serious breakages.
> > 
> > It's a balance of freshness versus stability, and that balance is 
> > kept by maintainers.
> > 
> > If you want the latest development code - go engage with the 
> > development trees directly.
> > 
> > If you want something that is relatively new (i.e. 1-2 weeks fresh) 
> > but works on the range of systems we test, use what you get in 
> > linux-next.
> > 
> > It's your choice which one you pick.
> > 
> > But you cannot have both.
> > 
> > If you genuinely think you can have it both, by all means i 
> > encourage you to try it - it's all open source so you can run your 
> > own tree. Just please dont feel entitled to demand it from others.
> 
> Thanks for the explanation.  That's what I tried to ask for
> to begin with.  I guess that I have a language problem.

Note, six hours ago i reintegrated all the auto-next branches so 
this warning should be gone in the next linux-next iteration - they 
are now traded for brand new bugs ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/