[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C26D91.10804@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:06:41 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
Ilya Yanok <yanok@...raft.com>, Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] async_tx: add support for asynchronous GF multiplication
Dan Williams wrote:
> + * @scfs: array of source coefficients used in GF-multiplication
Array of source coefficients? Are you doing a vector-vector
multiplication here?
Given this code:
> for (d = 0; d < len; d++) {
> + wq = wp = ptrs[0][d];
> + for (z = 1; z < src_cnt; z++) {
> + wd = ptrs[z][d];
> + wp ^= wd;
> + wq ^= raid6_gfmul[scfs[z]][wd];
> + }
... it kinds of looks like that.
This is really quite expensive! The whole point of the restore code
that exists is that we never do a two-dimensional lookup, instead
caching a pointer to the multiplication table that we intend to use,
because the RAID-6 code only ever contains scalar-vector multiplications.
I really don't get this, and I think it's broken.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists