[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090319162719.GB32078@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:27:19 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Sindhudweep Sarkar <sindhudweep.sarkar@...il.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Intel Poulsbo/Morrestown DRM driver and DRM core
changes
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:03:09PM -0400, Sindhudweep Sarkar wrote:
> This might be the opinion of a completely non educated end user but it
> seems that an intel specific drm and other bits (xorg, mesa) would be
> somewhat of a maintenance waste.
What do you mean by this?
> TI-OMAP 3xxx and a couple of other arm processors use similar SGX-5xx
> graphics cores. IIRC arm is often little endian so perhaps a unified
> driver would be easier in the long term.
Long term lots of things are good.
But how do I get my laptop that I currently have right now up and
running properly with linux in a better-than-800x600-framebuffer mode?
That's why I need/want this driver now, there are hundreds of thousands
of these types of laptops in the pipeline to users and I want them to
run Linux, not be forced to run some other operating system...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists