[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090319162942.GA21672@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:29:42 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: remove cpumask allocation from idle_balance
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > This time for sure,
>
> not so sure:
>
> [ 4.303068] =============================================================================
> [ 4.303332] BUG idr_layer_cache: Redzone overwritten
> [ 4.303332] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 4.303332]
> [ 4.303332] INFO: 0xffff88003f838958-0xffff88003f83895f. First byte 0xa1 instead of 0xbb
> [ 4.303332] INFO: Allocated in 0xffff88003f9b94b0 age=4294878587 cpu=2 pid=0
> [ 4.303332] INFO: Freed in 0xffff88003f8389f0 age=18446744073709463001 cpu=4294967295 pid=0
> [ 4.303332] INFO: Slab 0xffffe200015d5340 objects=13 used=10 fp=0xffff88003f838738 flags=0x40000000000020c3
> [ 4.303332] INFO: Object 0xffff88003f838738 @offset=1848 fp=0x(null)
hm, i'm seeing this even with the cpus4096 bits removed.
It _seems_ to trigger when i add these two commits:
71ff49d: x86: with the last user gone, remove set_pte_present
b40c757: x86/32: no need to use set_pte_present in set_pte_vaddr
but i'm not completely sure it's related, i tried a bisection and it
showed heisenbug properties.
Might have come from upstream, that saw some IDR changes recently.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists