[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49C4D9C4.1030103@vflare.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:42:52 +0530
From: Nitin Gupta <nitingupta910@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xvmalloc memory allocator
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:13:42 +0530 Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
> But what is regrettable is that xvmalloc appears to be tied to
> compressed-swap in some manner. Is it not possible to split these two
> initiatives apart so that neither is dependent upon the other? Or is
> compressed-swap hopelessly crippled without xvmalloc?
xvmalloc itself is completely independent of compressed-swap. Infact, its
loaded as separate kernel module (xvmalloc.ko)
However, this compression project is almost useless without this specialized
allocator.
>
> (compcache is a terrible name, btw - it isn't a "compressed cache" at all!)
>
I have now heard this many times and my conscious is beginning to hurt now :)
I will change it to match name of its block device: ramzswap sounds better?
>> Anyways, I will move it to drivers/block.
>
> This sounds like it might be a backward step.
I'm bit confused here. Last thing I want to do is block mainline merge
because of such issues. Its real pain to maintain these things separately.
Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists