[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090321032636.fdeae224.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:26:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: ngupta@...are.org
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] compcache documentation
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:44:08 +0530 Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org> wrote:
> ...
>
> + backing_dev: This is block device to be used as backing store for compcache.
> + It must be a valid swap partition. We move data to this device when we
> + encounter incompressible page or memlimit is reached. TODO: we may also
> + move some pages from compcache to this device in case system is really
> + low on memory.
> + This device is not directly visible to kernel as a swap device
> + (/proc/swaps will only show /dev/ramzswap0 and not this device).
> + Managing this backing device is the job of compcache module.
hrm, OK, it kinda/sorta/maybe might be a little bit like a "compressed
cache". But if someone comes up with a real compressed cache (ie:
pagecache) then they'll want their name back.
Also, the kernel already has a widespread and well-established "backing
device" concept, in include/linux/backing-dev.h. This new feature's
poaching of that identifier is a bit confusing. It would be nice to do a
wholesale rename if possible. secondary_dev? nv_dev?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists