[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237805560.2630.16.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:22:40 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cleanup patches 20090322
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:35 +0100, Hannes Eder wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
> <jaswinder@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 18:45 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> On Monday 23 March 2009 07:22:56 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> > x86: e820.h fix various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c
> >>
> >> Wouldn't fixing the users be better than changing the header? Esp. since
> >> it could well now cause similar warnings in userspace programs.
> >>
> >> > struct e820map {
> >> > - __u32 nr_map;
> >> > + __s32 nr_map;
> >> > struct e820entry map[E820_X_MAX];
> >> > };
> >>
> >> This number can't be negative!
> >>
> >
> > Is this OK, or should I go more further:
>
> since sanitize_e820_map does only modify its third argument on
> success, and leaves it untouched on error, the temporary variable
> could be eliminated in some places.
OK, this is different issue so I will send this in separate patch.
Thanks,
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists