linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 1/6] slab: introduce __kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020903231049o11de5287w7bdb5c28e866dafb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:49:01 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/6] slab: introduce __kfree_rcu

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> Anyway, these are nuances and if you go strictly by what's minimally
> required by Documentation/CodingStyle you can stop a lot sooner than
> having to bother about such fine details. The original version was
> certainly acceptable - it's just that IMO Pekka was right that it
> can be done better.

Well, like I said, it was a minor nitpick, that's all. I would prefer
it the way I and Ingo suggested but if you don't want to change it,
that's fine as well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/