[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CA48A0.6000404@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:07:12 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: coly.li@...e.de
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-03-23-22-34 uploaded (reiserfs)
Coly Li wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> Randy Dunlap Wrote:
>> akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-03-23-22-34 has been uploaded to
>>>
>>> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>>>
>>> and will soon be available at
>>>
>>> git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/mmotm.git
>>>
>>> It contains the following patches against 2.6.29-rc8:
>>
>>> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2-v2.patch
>> fs/built-in.o: In function `reiserfs_statfs':
>> super.c:(.text+0x7332b): undefined reference to `crc32_le'
>> super.c:(.text+0x7333f): undefined reference to `crc32_le'
>>
> Hmm, it should not be. The v2 patch includes linux/crc32.h, and I tested without
> any error. Now I am downloading mmotm to verify.
CONFIG_CRC32=m
Since reiserfs is built into the kernel image (CONFIG_REISERFS=y),
CONFIG_CRC32 also needs to be =y.
Probably just add
select CRC32
select BITREVERSE
to the REISERFS_FS kconfig entry.
> BTW, from series file of mmotm, I see two version patches,
> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2.patch
> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2-v2.patch
> are all included. I suspect whether this is a proper behavior.
The v2 patch mostly replaces the first one. I don't see a
problem with them.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists