linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2009-03-23-22-34 uploaded (reiserfs)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49CA60FF.9030602@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:51:11 +0800
From:	Coly Li <coly.li@...e.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-03-23-22-34 uploaded (reiserfs)



Randy Dunlap Wrote:
> Coly Li wrote:
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> Randy Dunlap Wrote:
>>> akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>>>> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-03-23-22-34 has been uploaded to
>>>>
>>>>    http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>>>>
>>>> and will soon be available at
>>>>
>>>>    git://git.zen-sources.org/zen/mmotm.git
>>>>
>>>> It contains the following patches against 2.6.29-rc8:
>>>> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2-v2.patch
>>> fs/built-in.o: In function `reiserfs_statfs':
>>> super.c:(.text+0x7332b): undefined reference to `crc32_le'
>>> super.c:(.text+0x7333f): undefined reference to `crc32_le'
>>>
>> Hmm, it should not be. The v2 patch includes linux/crc32.h, and I tested without
>> any error. Now I am downloading mmotm to verify.
> 
> CONFIG_CRC32=m
> 
> Since reiserfs is built into the kernel image (CONFIG_REISERFS=y),
> CONFIG_CRC32 also needs to be =y.
> Probably just add
> 	select CRC32
> 	select BITREVERSE
> to the REISERFS_FS kconfig entry.
> 
Oh, I thought of that, yeah, I will send another patch for the fix.
Thanks for pointing out this :)

>> BTW, from series file of mmotm, I see two version patches,
>> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2.patch
>> fs-reiserfs-return-f_fsid-for-statfs2-v2.patch
>> are all included. I suspect whether this is a proper behavior.
> 
> The v2 patch mostly replaces the first one.  I don't see a
> problem with them.
> 
Interesting, don't know how it works so well ;))


-- 
Coly Li
SuSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/