[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20903251011w3f6b3f58u7c0352ae39bb1c7c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:11:04 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>, Ilya Yanok <yanok@...raft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] async_tx: don't use src_list argument of
async_xor() for dma addresses
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org> wrote:
> On 12:20, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> Using src_list argument of async_xor() as a storage for dma addresses
>> implies sizeof(dma_addr_t) <= sizeof(struct page *) restriction which is
>> not always true (e.g. ppc440spe).
>
> This message does not tell what the patch is going to do about that.
> It would also be nice to mention (either in the log message or as a
> comment) why allocating the dma_src arrays on the stack is not going
> to be a problem.
>
True, and taking into account your other comment about the number of
parameters I think this is a good opportunity to solve this problem
rather than kick it down the road. So I will prepare a rework to make
this memory caller provided. This gives us the flexibility to use a
kmalloc'd buffer hanging off the stripe_head as Neil suggested in
another thread.
Regards,
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists