[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090326103912.GP17185@skl-net.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:39:12 +0100
From: Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.de, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
Yuri Tikhonov <yur@...raft.com>, Ilya Yanok <yanok@...raft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] async_tx: don't use src_list argument of async_xor() for dma addresses
On 10:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org> wrote:
> > On 12:20, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> >> Using src_list argument of async_xor() as a storage for dma addresses
> >> implies sizeof(dma_addr_t) <= sizeof(struct page *) restriction which is
> >> not always true (e.g. ppc440spe).
> >
> > This message does not tell what the patch is going to do about that.
> > It would also be nice to mention (either in the log message or as a
> > comment) why allocating the dma_src arrays on the stack is not going
> > to be a problem.
> >
>
> True, and taking into account your other comment about the number of
> parameters I think this is a good opportunity to solve this problem
> rather than kick it down the road. So I will prepare a rework to make
> this memory caller provided. This gives us the flexibility to use a
> kmalloc'd buffer hanging off the stripe_head as Neil suggested in
> another thread.
Glad you agree. I'm looking forward to seeing the reworked patch set.
Thanks
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists