[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090325223642.GK7278@localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:36:42 -0700
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shai@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:16:14PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>> It is already there, and has been there! But we still need to make
>> vsmp64.c compile only when CONFIG_X86_64 is defined no?
>>
>
> I still think you should restructure it so that vsmp_64.c only gets
> compiled with CONFIG_X86_VSMP enabled. Having all that stuff compiled into
> every kernel seems pretty pointless.
>
Well, not everything gets compiled in. Only the is_vsmp_box() logic and
related stuff gets compiled in. Other paravirt related stuff in vsmp64.c
depends on CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
Thanks,
Kiran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists