[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CABB25.8040106@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:15:49 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
shai@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:16:14PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>>
>>> It is already there, and has been there! But we still need to make
>>> vsmp64.c compile only when CONFIG_X86_64 is defined no?
>>>
>>>
>> I still think you should restructure it so that vsmp_64.c only gets
>> compiled with CONFIG_X86_VSMP enabled. Having all that stuff compiled into
>> every kernel seems pretty pointless.
>>
>>
>
> Well, not everything gets compiled in. Only the is_vsmp_box() logic and
> related stuff gets compiled in. Other paravirt related stuff in vsmp64.c
> depends on CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
>
Sure, but it would be cleaner if the whole file were controlled by
CONFIG_X86_VSMP. is_vsmp_box() is already defined as const inline
returning 0 if !CONFIG_X86_VSMP.
J
> Thanks,
> Kiran
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists